Kroger, the nation’s largest supermarket chain, recently announced the shuttering of its home delivery service, a move impacting customers across several states and raising questions about the future of grocery delivery. This decision marks a significant shift in Kroger’s strategy after investing heavily in automated fulfillment centers designed to make online ordering and delivery more efficient.
The delivery service being discontinued utilized the company’s “spoke and hub” model, featuring automated fulfillment centers, sometimes referred to as “Customer Fulfillment Centers” (CFCs), as hubs and smaller satellite locations, the “spokes,” from which delivery drivers would distribute orders to customers’ homes. Kroger had partnered with Ocado, a UK-based technology company specializing in warehouse automation, to develop and operate these facilities. The expectation was that these technologically advanced centers would allow Kroger to compete more effectively with other grocery delivery services and even traditional brick-and-mortar stores by offering a wider selection, faster delivery times, and lower prices.
While Kroger hasn’t explicitly stated the reasons behind the shutdown, industry analysts speculate several contributing factors were at play. The high costs associated with building and operating the automated fulfillment centers, combined with the logistical challenges of managing the delivery network, likely proved to be a significant drain on resources. Maintaining these technologically complex systems requires substantial investment in both equipment and specialized personnel. Furthermore, the competitive landscape of grocery delivery has intensified in recent years with established players like Instacart, Amazon Fresh, and Walmart expanding their reach and services. The promotional pricing and various deals offered by these competitors may have pressured Kroger’s margins.
Another potential factor is evolving consumer behavior. While online grocery shopping experienced a surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, demand has since plateaued as customers have returned to in-store shopping. This shift might have reduced the viability of Kroger’s dedicated delivery service, making it difficult to achieve the necessary order volumes to justify the investment in automated fulfillment centers. Concerns regarding delivery fees and potential markups on products compared to in-store prices could also deter some customers from using home delivery services consistently.
The implications of this shutdown are far-reaching. Customers relying on Kroger’s home delivery service, particularly those with limited mobility or living in areas with fewer grocery store options, will need to find alternative solutions. For Kroger, the company is now pivoting to other delivery methods, including third-party partnerships and expanding its in-store pickup options. While the company is scaling back from the “spoke and hub” model, Kroger remains committed to offering online grocery options. It’s also possible that Kroger will leverage the technologies and learnings from the Ocado partnership to enhance its existing e-commerce operations and improve efficiency in its traditional stores.
The Kroger home delivery shutdown serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges and complexities of online grocery delivery. It demonstrates that technological innovation alone is not enough to guarantee success in this rapidly evolving market. Companies must carefully consider factors such as infrastructure costs, consumer demand, and competitive pressures to develop sustainable and profitable delivery strategies.
1440×960 kroger close stores seattle passed hazard pay from www.washingtonpost.com 
1536×2048 kroger closing clearydome from clearydome.com 
1600×900 kroger closing stores raleigh durham abc raleigh durham from abc11.com